TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Criminal    Uriega v. State
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Uriega v. State Login/Join 
Member
posted
I just got through reading the Uriega case. The way that I read the case is that the ten year rule applies to the length bewteen each prior conviction that is being used to enhance the offense to a felony DWI.

Therefore, if your offense occured on 3/1/04 and you had a prior offense in 2/1/00 and 1/1/89, you are now restricted to at best a DWI 2nd rather than a DWI 3rd (This is assuming that the 1/1/89 conviction had no probationary term that would bring to within 10 years of the 2/1/00 prior conviction).

What are other jurisdictions doing based on this opinion. Filing as DWI 2nd under this scenario, filing as DWI 3rds?

Is PDR forthcoming from the State?
 
Posts: 70 | Location: Hunt County | Registered: February 27, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 2138 | Location: McKinney, Texas, USA | Registered: February 15, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

TDCAA    TDCAA Community  Hop To Forum Categories  Criminal    Uriega v. State

© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.