Go | New | Find | Tools |
|
RE:
PSI questions (in Criminal) by Jimbeaux Did the plea bargain include a promise that there would be no PSI? That would be an odd thing to bar...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Breath Test Refusal Jury Instruction (in Criminal) by JimbeauxHess v. State, (Fort Worth - 4/5/07) (instruction that breath test refusal may be considered as evi...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Teen Fights Removal of Bullet in Head (in Criminal) by JimbeauxUnfortunately, we don't get to find out an answer: ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Bluebook question (in Appellate) by JimbeauxWell, except that "www.news.google.com" is not the proper URL. Get rid of "www".... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
PDR? (in Appellate) by JimbeauxWell, in Gordon's case they don't seem to have stipulated to the fact that the conviction was within...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
PDR? (in Appellate) by JimbeauxHmm.. . Then it seems the issue turns on whether the "five years" thing is an element. And it probab...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
PDR? (in Appellate) by JimbeauxUnless I'm misreading it, the opinion seems to indicate the stipulation doesn't refer back to the in...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Appellate
RE:
What's the offense -- other than being a creep? (in Criminal) by Jimbeaux...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Crawford and 911 calls (in Criminal) by JimbeauxJohn S: wrt forfeiture by wrongdoing, see cases collected in: ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Defendant not testifying (in Criminal) by Jimbeaux1. I don't think so. If it's not error to fail to sua sponte give such an instruction, see Brown v...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
New US Suprem Court case -- Georgia v. Randolph (in Criminal) by JimbeauxThe problem is that we've jettisoned a bright line rule for one that isn't so bright. It would be mo...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
New US Suprem Court case -- Georgia v. Randolph (in Criminal) by JimbeauxJohn, it probably would have changed the analysis, but I think that makes the opinion even less defe...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
New US Suprem Court case -- Georgia v. Randolph (in Criminal) by JimbeauxWhile I wouldn't characterize the opinion as "offensive", I do think it odd that it is now constitut...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Dope House For Sale (in Criminal) by JimbeauxI would have thought this kind of thing was ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Enhancing the Enhanced Offense for Evading w/Motor Vehicle (in Criminal) by JimbeauxWell, you have a good point about referring to sec. 49.09 (which coincidentally is called "enhanced ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Enhancing the Enhanced Offense for Evading w/Motor Vehicle (in Criminal) by Jimbeaux...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Need help! (in Criminal) by JimbeauxI'd forgotten that obscenity (non-selling) was also a Class A misdemeanor. Assumed it was a B, for ...... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal
RE:
Need help! (in Criminal) by JimbeauxHow about PC 43.24 -- display of harmful material to minor (under 18)?... TDCAA > TDCAA Community > Criminal | » Refine Search » New Search |
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© TDCAA, 2001. All Rights Reserved.
