Mr. Newell, how is it that you know something about every case, law, statute, rule of evidence or procedure in both the federal and state systems? Do you follow the individual circuits as well? More disturbingly, how come you're right 99 and 9/10ths % of the time?
Very impressive. You should be a judge. If Obama and the Senate would only put you and AndreaW up there with the Supremes...
Posts: 2578 | Location: The Great State of Texas | Registered: December 26, 2001
Mr. Newell, how is it that you know something about every case, law, statute, rule of evidence or procedure in both the federal and state systems? Do you follow the individual circuits as well? More disturbingly, how come you're right 99 and 9/10ths % of the time?
Very impressive. You should be a judge.
Posts: 2578 | Location: The Great State of Texas | Registered: December 26, 2001
I did not see any different. Nothing to see here folks. Move along. I mean, they can always try to argue by analogy, but it looked like straight up statutory interpretation of a federal statute to me. But that's the new Supreme Court case on possession of Fraudulent ID.
[This message was edited by David Newell on 07-08-09 at .]
